STOP Selling Your Winners! (Do THIS Instead)

👋 JOIN THE FAMILY: http://www.patreon.com/investanswers 📈 IA MODELS: https://investanswers.io/indicators 🏖️ IA RETIREMENT TOOLS: https://investanswers.io/retirement-tools 🧠 FREE INVESTOR QUIZ: https://investor-profiler.investanswers.io 📬 IA NEWSLETTER: https://investanswers.substack.com 🪙 IA CRYPTO COMPENDIUM: http://investanswers.io/crypto-compendium ⚙️ IA SCP Profiler: http://investanswers.io/scp-profiler 🌐 TradingView Referral: https://www.tradingview.com/?aff_id=27663 DISCLAIMER: InvestAnswers does not provide financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. None of the content on the InvestAnswers channels is financial, investment, tax, or legal advice and should not be taken as such; the content is intended only for educational and entertainment purposes. InvestAnswers (James) shares some of his trades as learning examples but they are only relevant to his specific portfolio allocation, risk tolerance & financial expertise, may not constitute a comprehensive or complete discussion of such topics, and should not be emulated. The content of this video is solely the opinion(s) of the speaker who is not a licensed financial advisor or registered investment advisor. Trading equities or cryptocurrencies poses considerable risk of loss. Kindly use your judgment and do your own research at all times. You are solely responsible for your own financial, investing, and trading decisions. 00:00 Introduction 00:59 When Bitcoin’s price drops below what it costs to mine profitably, a lot of miners shut down their rigs — hash rate falls and blocks slow down until the next difficulty adjustment kicks in. My question is: does that drop in mining activity actually have any real effect on Bitcoin’s scarcity or supply, or is the halving schedule the only thing that truly controls issuance regardless of what miners are doing? Basically, is miner capitulation a security/profitability story, or does it touch scarcity at all? 01:50 BTC Price $64K, Cost to Mine $76K 03:39 Miner Capitulation Is Security, Not Scarcity and Hash Ribbons & Supply Dynamics Math 05:08 Watching the recent Cyber Bulls discussion there was lots of discussion about Tesla and SpaceX. Off the back of that I have a question about what we should focus on in terms of stacking; Tsla and or Spcx? Does a potential merger between the two make a difference? In other words am I wasting funds buying SpaceX if I should be focusing on Tesla - or vice versa? 06:07 TSLA or SPACEX (SPCX) for Stacking? Merger Impact? 07:15 Liquidity + Execution Edge to TSLA 07:38 Tesla Vs. SpaceX: The Liquidity & TAM Math 08:15 Tesla TAMs Are Larger Than SpaceX 09:01 IA TSLA SPCX Arb Model 10:58 Buying dips in high-conviction assets (IA13/crypto proxies) is easy, but selling gives me analysis paralysis. I trade spot stock in a tax-free wrapper (no options/no tax). In your experience, which approach is better for peace of mind and long-term gains: HOLD LONG TERM (do you need a strict macro target or do you hold indefinitely) or LAYERING OUT (LILO) (taking profits on the way up)? Hold Long Term vs Layering Out (LILO) 13:12 IA NVDA Case 15:30 Example IA13 2030 Price Targets 17:32 The Math Destroying the LILO Strategy 18:47 Conviction Over Analysis Paralysis 20:04 I’m feeling conflicted due to disconnects with two other rules you advise. Since 2021 the CAGR on Tesla sits well short of your minimum 14% target. And while Tesla always seems to be on the precipice of something transformative - FSD, Cybercab, Optimus - none of it is generating meaningful revenue yet. So my question is: at what point does this become ‘hope as a strategy’ (second rule) if execution at scale continues to drag? 21:21 The 14% CAGR Rule 23:58 The Tesla 4 Year Cycles 24:41 Tesla TAMs Are Larger Than SpaceX 25:28 When Hope Becomes Toxic 26:39 For younger investors (I’m 25) with a long time horizon and high conviction in a hated, deeply oversold name like MSTR right now. What’s an acceptable max concentration % before it’s reckless, not brave? 27:03 Concentration Risk Vs. Asymmetric Conviction 28:09 MSTR PTs 1 Year From Now 29:07 A voice I respect, Anthony Pompliano, recently interviewed Andrew Kang, CEO of the RoboStrategy ETF which seems like an intriguing investment vehicle. Are you familiar with the fund? My questions are: (a) is it too early to expect a good ROI from such an investment, (b) how would I even begin to determine a fair share value, and (c) for exposure to the sector, would I be better off just buying more TSLA? 29:48 BOT ETF Fees 30:02 BOT ETF Holdings 30:50 The Wall Street Fee Trap: Avoid BOT ETF 31:42 Pure Play Apex Predator Vs. Diluted ETFs 33:45 Optimus Factory Scale 34:21 Helping Animals 35:00 Thoughts on exiting Amazon with 2x Gains and put in Marvel at this level?