BitMEX Liquidation Lawsuit Alleges ‘God Access’ Insider Trading Desk

NewsFri, 24 Jul 2026 18:40:40 UTC2 hours ago
BitMEX Liquidation Lawsuit Alleges ‘God Access’ Insider Trading Desk

On the same day BitMEX announced it was closing its doors after 11 years, a federal class action lawsuit landed in the Southern District of New York accusing the exchange and its co-founders of systematically looting customer collateral through rigged liquidations. The timing was striking — but perhaps not coincidental. The BitMEX liquidation lawsuit, filed July 23, 2026, names co-founder Arthur Hayes along with Benjamin Delo, Samuel Reed, and former business development head Gregory Dwyer as defendants, alongside exchange entities HDR Global Trading and 100x Holdings.

Key takeaways

  • Plaintiffs BKX Services Inc. and David Namdar filed a class action on July 23, 2026, seeking the return of 622.66 BTC — worth roughly $40 million — plus compensatory and punitive damages.
  • The complaint alleges BitMEX auto-liquidated customer positions while holding collateral worth approximately twice their losses, routing the excess into the exchange’s insurance fund.
  • An internal “Insider Trading Desk” allegedly had “God access” to customer positions and traded during server freezes that locked out everyone else.
  • BitMEX announced its shutdown on September 23, 2026 at 04:00 UTC, following a strategic review; the exchange had already fallen to under 0.01% market share with daily volumes around $400,000.
  • Co-founders Hayes, Delo, Reed, and Dwyer were pardoned by President Trump in March 2025 after pleading guilty in 2022 to Bank Secrecy Act violations.

BitMEX and Founders Sued for Liquidation Misconduct

The core accusation is damning in its specificity. Plaintiffs BKX Services Inc. and David Namdar allege that BitMEX did not simply liquidate their leveraged positions when markets moved against them — it kept the leftover collateral. According to the complaint, when their positions were force-closed, the remaining collateral was worth roughly twice their actual losses. Rather than returning the surplus to customers, BitMEX routed it into the exchange’s own insurance fund.

… Continue reading the full article at the original source below.

Read from Source · en.cryptonomist.ch ↗
This content is automatically aggregated. Full credit goes to the original publisher (en.cryptonomist.ch).

Related