Courts Can’t Agree on Who Regulates Kalshi and Now the Supreme Court May Have to Step In
TLDR
- The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Kalshi, saying Nevada has the right to regulate its sports event contracts
- The court said Kalshi’s contracts are sports bets, not “swaps” under federal commodities law
- This conflicts with an April ruling that blocked New Jersey from regulating Kalshi, creating a circuit split
- The CFTC argues it has exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets and says the court misread the law
- Legal experts and the CFTC say the U.S. Supreme Court will likely need to settle the dispute
A federal appeals court has ruled against prediction markets platform Kalshi, saying Nevada has the right to regulate its sports betting contracts. The decision adds more legal pressure to a fast-growing industry already fighting battles in multiple states.
LATEST: 🇺🇸 The Ninth Circuit appeals court ruled sports-related event contracts from Kalshi, Crypto.com and Robinhood aren't "swaps," rejecting their bid to block Nevada's gaming regulator from halting operations. pic.twitter.com/Yh2uhGOmLC
… Continue reading the full article at the original source below.
This content is automatically aggregated. Full credit goes to the original publisher (coincentral.com).
