Self-Custody Remains Bitcoin’s Best Defense, Says Early Developer After Coldcard Flaw
TL;DR
- Peter Todd argues that the Coldcard firmware incident, which reportedly caused around $88 million in Bitcoin losses, does not weaken the long-term case for self-custody.
- He believes centralized platforms continue to expose users to larger systemic risks than individual hardware wallet failures.
- The developer highlights exchange collapses such as QuadrigaCX, where losses exceeded $200 million, as proof that giving private keys to third parties remains a major security risk.
The debate over Bitcoin self-custody has intensified after reports that a Coldcard firmware vulnerability allowed attackers to steal approximately $88 million in BTC. While critics argue the incident exposes weaknesses in personal custody solutions, early Bitcoin developer Peter Todd maintains that self-custody remains the strongest protection for long-term Bitcoin holders when compared with centralized alternatives.
> It’s not a time to act as if self custody is risk less and those who promoted it as if it was easy were correct.
… Continue reading the full article at the original source below.
This content is automatically aggregated. Full credit goes to the original publisher (crypto-economy.com).
