MiCA License M&A: Why Crypto Firms May Buy Rather Than Apply

MiCA flipped from “coming soon” to “you must have it” this summer. That changed boardroom math overnight. If you want to keep serving EU users, you either hold a CASP authorisation or you get out of the way.

Plenty of teams built toward an application. Others are now eyeing something faster: buy a licensed platform, then plug in your product and passport across the bloc.

This isn’t a theoretical exercise. Supervisors have drawn the line. And the authorised market already holds most of the volume, so the pressure is real.

Point Details MiCA enforcement is live EU/EEA crypto-asset service providers must hold a CASP authorisation from 1 July 2026; those without should wind down EU activities (CSSF). Authorised venues dominate Exchanges with MiCA authorisation handled roughly 83% of European trading volume by June 2026 (The Block/Kaiko). Licences are finite and clustered 338 CASPs listed as authorised across 26 EEA states as of 26 July 2026, with heavy concentration in Germany, France, and the Netherlands (Penning; MICA Watch). Why buy vs apply Time-to-market, passportability, and supervisory track records can outweigh the cost and uncertainty of a fresh application. Big caveat Change-of-control approvals, fit-and-proper checks, and integration risks can stretch timelines if you underestimate the compliance lift.

… Continue reading the full article at the original source below.