Binance Defamation Battle Heats Up as WSJ Seeks Case Dismissal

TLDR

• WSJ asks judge to dismiss Binance defamation lawsuit over Iran-linked reports

• Binance says WSJ reporting falsely linked staff firings to Iran investigations

• Judge reviews 22 disputed statements as Binance defamation battle intensifies

• WSJ argues Binance failed to show actual malice in its defamation complaint

• Binance lawsuit follows years of US scrutiny over compliance and sanctions rules

Binance faces a critical stage in its defamation lawsuit after The Wall Street Journal asked a federal judge for dismissal. The dispute centers on reports linking Iranian sanctions concerns with internal compliance actions at the crypto exchange. Judge Paul Engelmayer heard arguments Wednesday and took the dismissal request under submission without issuing an immediate decision.

Wall Street Journal Challenges Binance Defamation Claims

According to recent news, the Journal argues Binance failed to show reporters knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for accuracy. Its attorneys said the exchange mainly relied on denials sent before and after the disputed stories appeared. However, the newspaper maintains those denials alone cannot establish actual malice under federal defamation standards.

… Continue reading the full article at the original source below.